Change in Massachusetts Politics Essay -- Massachusetts Politics Gover

Change in Massachu findts governmentMassachusetts has always been known for its politics. From the years of seat Hancock and John Adams to the Kennedy Compound and failed Dukakis presidential campaign, the Bay produce is, has been, and always will be a hotbed of political activism. But that does not mean that Massachusetts has a vibrant two party system.If anything can be said about Massachusetts, it is that the disk operating system and its voters are sure enough lop-sided towards one party. Massachusetts currently has Democrats choice all of their US House and US Senate Seats, as well as a 138 of 160 State House seats, and 33 of 40 State Senate seats. The but state-wide office held not held by the Democrats is the Governors seat, which is set to be widely contested next year with 7 candidates facing up to face incumbent acting Gov. Jane Swift.In the old days however, the story wasnt exactly the same. For practically every year in the first place 1928, Massachusetts overwh elming voted Republican. In fact, the first Republican floor attraction in the US Senate was Henry Cabot Lodge, Sr., from Massachusetts. Many of the famous Massachusetts politicians that flush to power in the first place world war two were Republicans, including President Calvin Coolidge, who before moving on to Vice President and President, was the Governor of Massachusetts.Somewhat standardised todays climate in the state, Massachusetts at that clock was also dominated by one party. It just happened to be the Republicans sooner than the Democrats. Before Franklin Roosevelt, the Democrats were largely the party of the Southern whites farmers who were ideologically different than the blue white businessmen that dominated politics and voted largely Republican.It is the party alter that is the most interesting and the most available to analyzing. There most certainly was a switch somewhere between the roaring twenties and the swell depression, but it not necessarily had everyt hing to do with the money in communitys pockets. The reasons for it are to be further explained.The Industrial Revolution in MassachusettsIn Massachusetts during the 1880s and 1890s, as in intimately every other part of the country, immigrants were arriving at unprecedented levels. Especially in Boston, but in other communities like Lowell, Brockton, Worcester, and Springfield, the demographic of people was slow ... ...once in 1984 during a campaign in which he lost only one state. Especially evident was in 1972, when Massachusetts was the only state in the nation that did not vote for Nixon in his re-election bid. That vote prompted the feignt Blame Me, Im from Massachusetts bumper sticker that salve puts a grin on Bay Staters faces today.Conclusion Massachusetts, A aim to be uniqueSince the Great Depression, the entire nation has been much much supportive of Democrats than they previously were. Most of that support can be attributed to Roosevelts raw Deal, and the ineffec tiveness of Hoovers Republican strategies.In Massachusetts, however, on that point has always been a different reason for doing things. This was no different. While the frugality may have played a major role, Massachusetts tilt was evident before the true start of the depression.Similar changes happened in New York, Rhode Island, and other industrial states. However, Massachusetts has always prided themselves on being a leader and an innovator, and as proved by the analysis into the elections of the 20s and 30s, it is evident that this major swing in political beliefs was no different.